二次污水微過濾膜處理效果評價
Membrane Microfiltration of Secondary Wastewater Effluent

Principal Researchers: Steven McGee, Rajeshkumar Pa, Adrian C. Penisson,
Robert D. Hill and Mark R. Wiesner

MARK R. WIESNER
RESEARCH GROUP
Environmental & Energy Systems Institute
Civil & Environmental Engineering
Chemical Engineering
RICE UNIVERSITY ? HOUSTON, TEXAS

摘 要:

初步的研究目的是評估微濾膜在使用各種無機絮凝劑時處理二次污水的效果。在休士頓市的西南污水處理廠進行了每分鐘8 升水的小規(guī)模試驗。使用膜濾過的效果等同于或優(yōu)勝于工廠中使用的傳統(tǒng)的沙過濾。據(jù)觀察對包括大腸桿菌在內的微粒污染物具有良好的清除效果。經與工廠所用過濾設備的比較，膜濾過質量更穩(wěn)定。與一端被封閉的操作方法比較，交叉流動的方法并不能改善濾過效果，也不能阻止橫跨膜壓力的增加?？列詨A溶液的膜化學清除法要求約每五天做一次。與預期的一樣，當與膜微過濾協(xié)同對絮凝物作前處理時，也能清除污水中的磷。

Abstract

This pilot study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of membrane microfiltration in treating secondary wastewater effluent conditioned with various inorganic coagulants. A 8 liter per minute pilot (Memcore) was operated at the City of Houston's Southwest Wastewater Treatment Plant. Membrane permeates were of similar or better quality than filtrates from plant's conventional sand filters. Good removal of particulate contaminants, including coliform bacteria, was observed. In comparison with the plant's filtrate, permeate quality was also much less variable. Operating the pilot in a crossflow configuration did not improve the permeate quality and did not retard the increase in transmembrane pressure in comparison with dead-end operation. Chemical cleaning of the membrane with caustic solution was required approximay once every 5 days. As anticipated, results indicate that coagulation pretreatment in conjunction with membrane microfiltration can also be used to remove phosphorus from wastewater.

Introduction

Only a few studies have evaluated membrane microfiltration of secondary wastewater effluent. Microfiltration membranes might be used to achieve very low turbidy effluents with very little variance in treated water quality. Because bacteria and many other microorganisms are also removed, such membrane disinfection might avoid the need for chlorine and subsequent dechlorination. Metal salts of iron or aluminum may also be added to enhance membrane performance. For example, iron or aluminum coagulants may be added
to precipitate otherwise soluble species such as phosphorus and arsenic as well as improving the removal of viral particles. Coagulation of colloidal materials may also increase the effective size of particles applied to membranes and increase permeate flux by 1) reducing foulant penetration into membrane pores, 2) forming a more porous cake on the membrane surface, 3) decreasing the accumulation of materials on the membrane due to particle size effects of particle transport, and 4) improving the backflushing characteristics of the membrane. We report on pilot experiments in which secondary wastewater effluent was filtered using membrane microfiltration. Some preliminary results using a commercial polyaluminum coagulant (Kemira Water Treatment, Inc.)4 to pretreat the feed water are also reported.

Materials and Methods 原料及方法

A skid-mounted microfiltration membrane pilot5 with a nominal capacity of 8 liters/minute was used in this study. This pilot uses 4 membrane modules, each with 1 m2 of outside-in hollow fiber membrane area with an effective pore size of 0.2 μm. Feed water to the pilot was drawn from a secondary clarifier at the Houston Southwest Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). Clarified water at the WWTP is subsequently chlorinated and filtered using conventional sand filters before being dechlorinated. The dechlorinated effluent is discharged into Brays Bayou, a river which runs through residential portions of the City of Houston and is bordered with parks, jogging paths and bike trails.

The membrane unit was operated in a constant permeate flux mode in which the transmembrane pressure (TMP) increases over time as materials deposit on and in the membrane. Permeate flux was set at 340 L/hr and readjusted as needed to maintain this flow. The unit was operated in both dead-end and crossflow filtration modes. During dead-end filtration, all water entering the membrane module exits as permeate. In the crossflow mode, a portion of the water entering the module flows across the membrane fibers and exits the module as concentrate. In both modes of operation, the pilot was automatically backflushed every 20 minutes, resulting in a recovery (permeate flow divided by feed flow) for the unit of 82 %. One run was also performed with backflushing once every 5 hours corresponding to a recovery of 98%.

Samples from the feed and permeate flows were analyzed for turbidity, total organic carbon (TOC), phosphorous concentration, and particle size distribution. TOC was measured using a Shimadzu TOC 500 total organic carbon analyzer. Phosphorus concentrations were measured colorimetrically. The particle size distributions of the feed and permeates were measured using an electronic particle counter (Coulter Multisizer) which operates on the electrical sensing zone principle. Samples were also analyzed for total and fecal coliforms. Similar analyses were performed on samples of influent and effluent water from the packed bed filters at the treatment plant during the same period of operation.

濾過前、后分別取樣，分析濁度、有機碳總量（TOC）、磷濃度及粒度分布。有機碳總量（TOC）用Shimadzu TOC 500 分析儀，磷濃度使用比色分析。而濾過前與濾過后的顆粒粒徑分布的測量則選擇應用電子感應區(qū)原理的電子顆粒計數(shù)器（庫爾特計數(shù)器 Multisizer）。同時亦測量顆?？倲?shù)與殘留物中的大腸桿菌數(shù)量。填充層過濾器的濾前與濾后樣品的分析也類似于前者。

Conclusions

Membrane microfiltration produced a permeate of similar or better quality than that produced by conventional filtration. Good removal of particulate contaminants, including coliform bacteria, was observed. In this regard, the process appears to be as effective as chlorination for the removal of coliforms from secondary waste effluent. A key advantage is the ability to filter and disinfect in a single step without the need for subsequent dechlorination. Preliminary results indicate that coagulation pretreatment in conjunction with membrane microfiltration can be used to reduce phosphorus concentrations as well. There did not appear to be any advantage in running the microfiltration unit in a crossflow mode and there may even be some disadvantages. The permeate quality and evolution of pressure drop obtained from the membrane operated in the dead-end mode was similar or superior to that obtained under crossflow conditions.